Why many police situations fall together

Five years after the deadly religious riots, the capital of India, Delhi, and there is no legal conclusion in the eyes of people involved.

The BBC Hindi analysis resulted in acquitting or discharging more than 80% of the violence against the courts.

More than 50 people, Muslims mainlyIn February 2020, the Indians and Muslims were killed after the clashes between the Indians and Muslims. Violence – The had seen the city In decades – are stretched in days, hundreds of houses and shops are fired by fierce mobs.

BBC had previously reported During Riots, the events of the police were savagery and injured. Police claimed that the alleged “Pre-planned” allegedly allegedly claimed that violence was “planned in advance”, the “threat of India’s unity”.

758 work were registered in connection with the investigation and arrested more than 2,000 people. It included 18 student leaders and activists arrested in a job known as the “main assassination case”. It is impossible for a Dracony terrorist terrorist terrorist terrorism. Only six in six years and some were released as an activist Omar Khalid He is still in jail and waiting to start testing.

BBC Hindi examined the status of 758 jobs in relation to riots The Karkardooma Court in Delhi analyzed 126 work.

More than 80% of these 126 works were acquitted or discharged because the witnesses became hostile or supporting the charges. Only 20 of these cases saw the prisoner.

According to Indian laws, the court has a accused accused if the tribunal ties a case because there is not enough evidence to advance. Acquitted when the court knows that it is not guilty after being tried.

In connection with the charges against the crime, 758 jobs have only one belief and four acquittal and four acquittal and BBC’s information with India’s right.

126 Advanced analysis also showed that the court came to the Delhi police in the court, the Delhi police came heavy for the fields. In some cases, the defendants criticized the police for the “Punishment” “Pre-defined charges” document.

In most of the 126 work, police officers were presented as a witness of the events. However, for various reasons, he did not find the trial.

The judges suspected the discrepancies in police statements and the identity of the suspects by the police and suspected of suspicion in some cases Police also took part in the violence.

The judge said that when the riots of history revoked the riots of the history, “the failure of the investigation body is the failure of the correct investigation”. Court, Arson and Arson and plunder were allocated against three men – but no “concluded that he was arrested without a real or effective investigation.

Delhi police did not meet the BBC’s desire. In a report in April last year, the police said that all the investigations were carried out in a “reliable, fair and impartial” in the court.

Expressions from the accused and even the court’s observations, raise their questions about the investigation.

Shadow Alam, who spent 80 days in prison, said that the terror of riots will never forget the terror.

He took refuge in the roofing of a medical store where he worked with several people.

Only a few hours ago, the police came to the store and asked to close due to the ongoing fire.

“Suddenly, they came to another, and they took a few to the minibus,” he said.

When asked why he was taken from the police, he said they were accused of participating in riots.

“They called us and knocked on us. It was almost all of us to be arrested,” said Mr. Alam. He added that he submitted his medical report before the court approving three injuries.

In the official statement, the police accused Mr. Alam and 10 other Muslims from a shop. However, the court emptyed all of them before the court started.

The court criticized the investigation of the police, who said the testimony of witnesses would be “artificially prepared” and the shop “all the probability”.

When the incident took place in this direction, the police did not continue the work of the police.

Mr. Alam had to wait four years to officially close the case.

“All this happened during the Coven-19 pandemia. There was a lock. We were in a state of rage,” said Dilshad Ali, the father of the world.

“In the end, nothing was proven. But we should spend so much time and money to prove our innocence.”

He said they wanted money compensation for family losses. “If the police had done a false work against my son, then measures should be taken against them,” he said.

In another case, the court acquitted Sandip Bhati accused of dragging and beating a Muslim man during the riots.

Police presented two videos to show Mr Bhati. However, the lawyer in court said that police officers were presented to prevent the police clip.

In the full video confirming the BBC, Mr Bhati sees that he saved the Muslim man instead of beating it.

In January, the court, instead of watching the “true sinners”, the video “manipulated” the “Frame” of the “Frame” to the “Frame”.

This asked the Commissioner of Delhi Police to take appropriate measures against the expert investigated. Police did not answer the question of BBC Hindi’s failure to do this.

Mr. Bhati, who spent four months in prison, said he did not want to discuss Oral “refused to comment.

The former Supreme Court said the judge’s Madan Lokur, the prosecutor’s office and the police said “to accept what they had in five years.”

He also needs to be judged by the trial if the arrest was illegal or unnecessary. “

“If the prosecutor’s office puts the power to do or do it, because they want to do so, it should not be allowed to get away from him, if they want to do it,” he said.

As some cases fell apart in the courts, many of those arrested are still in prison in prison.

A 33-year-old doctoralist Gulfisha Fatima is among the 12 detained activists on charges of “conspirators” of riots.

Three police incidents against him were pledged in front of him and took hostage in all. However, he continues to follow the fourth in the fourth, under the UAPA (Prevention) Act (UAPA) (UAPA) (UAPA) – the fourth in exchange for the harsh terrorist law in exchange for collateral.

“Since he went to prison, we hope for every hearing that he will finally go out,” he said, his father Sied Tasneef Husseini told the BBC.

After waiting for Ms. Fatima, the judge from the Supreme Court of Delhi after waiting for months, the judge was transferred to the judge in 2023, and now the whole case is heard again.

“Sometimes I think that I will die before I saw it,” said Mr. Hussain.

Follow BBC News India Instagram, YouTube, Twitter and Facebook.