Physical Address
304 North Cardinal St.
Dorchester Center, MA 02124
Unlock Watch Bulletin Free from White House
Trump’s second term Washington, your guide for what tools for business and world
Maga was always about production. Donald Trump talks about the return of the Midwest back to the back of production lines, because most economically protected voters were placed in factory workers in the old production-line industries.
But last week, the president began to talk about the tariffs not steel, but also in foreign films. Now companies want to “do Hollywood again” to produce more movies in the United States.
At first glance, the idea of protecting the operation of the film looks like a bonker. America is the best film exporter in the world. Most Hollywood revenues come from a foreign audience that covers US action films, thriller and animated blocks. Movies are a large part of American soft power. Given all this, the tariff protection for Hollywood, the president’s nuts wanted skepticism from the most believers (and many conservatives).
They make mistakes. As far as Trump thoughts, the idea may be economically defective, but in a clever political point of view. Hollywood is a large city of unity and is a hot orange company for the Maga. Just like Pennsylvania steel workers and Indiana cars, Tinseltown, who has been a more dangerous position by Chinese shock, has been a worries about work from work, which has been fired outside of work outside of Los Angeles, which will justify the whole work model of the industry.
To capitalize on this, Trump offers an ordinary recipe: I will probably offer a solution that you will not work in the economic meaning.
These are most likely, most likely to be right right-to-right. As shown by academic research, open poverty will reduce the support of distant popups, medium-sized voters, the promises of the future promises of the future promises of the future. This “shrinking and shouting” predarat also stretches in the United States, as well as in many European countries.
Trump is not alone talking about the protection of Hollywood’s work. The governor of California, Gavin Newsom, for the industry, has offered a larger tax loan for the industrial work for industrial work – Chamber operators, electricians and makeup artists and others have been moved to where makeup artists and others are cheaper.
However, this work is also sensitive to technology – better digital equipment, you do not need a large number of people with the cameras, and in some cases of cosmetics. Moreover, technological violation is also a higher level of creative food.
Media, Content and Coding – All Top California Industries – are the most faster by AI. This was in the center of 2023 labor warfare carried out by Hollywood writers and actors. It has not been payable and benefit how many controlled employees, such as intangible assets and intellectual property and voices, such as digital images and sounds.
Intangible assets – represents about 80 percent of the value of the value of the Software, Patents, Digital Data, Trademarks and other IPs – large companies. This means that we live in a growing service economy, depending on digital information. The percentage of wealth living in IP will only grow.
Hollywood depends more than most intangible assets than most sectors. Many actors, members of the union (and thus health benefits), several people, in addition to a few steps in addition. But the digital image now eliminates most of this work. And many writers are changed, not just expanded by Chatgept.
The media can be in the forefront of violation, but the law and health are not eliminated. Trump’s promises promises promises promises promises promises promises promises promises promises promises promises promises promises promises promises promise promises. I could imagine foreign radiologists banned us to read or target x-rays Great law firms Hires virtual research partners. It is economically significant or frustrating. This is about political optics.
Thus, the Democrats are becoming more and more and more like the “abundance” agenda in regulatory reforms and develop a new group in the services of the 1990s, which are not similar to neoliberal policies. It’s so smart. And problematic. While the MAGA production line applies to a small pool of a handful of employees in a handful of swinging, the service sector represents 79 percent of the US labor force. Really dangerous policy.
