Physical Address

304 North Cardinal St.
Dorchester Center, MA 02124

X users treating Grok like a fact-checker spark concerns over misinformation


ELON MUSK’ın some users in the X, the inspection of facts, this fuel is becoming a task for a task for a concern among human truths that can know the wrong information.

Before this month, x effective Users call Xai’s groc and ask questions about different things. Was the action looks like embarrassmentEmployed an automated account in X to offer a similar experience.

After creating an automated account in Xai, XA, users began to test this by asking. Some people in the markets, including India, began to ask GroK to check the reviews and questions targeting certain political beliefs.

Facts checkers are worried about groc – or other AI AI AI Assistant – in this way – in this way, because the bots can meet confident sounds if they are not really real. Situation spread the fake news and Invalid information They were seen with a grock in the past.

Five Secretary of State in August last year call Musk will carry out critical changes to the GroK after auxiliary information created by an infected assistant in social networks before the US elections.

Other chatbots, including Openai’s Chatgpt and Google’s Twins create inaccurate information in the election last year. Separately, disinformation researchers can be easily used to chat AI, including Chatgpt in 2023 The convincing text with the wrong narrations.

“AI’s assistants are a response that sounds like a person who sounds like a grain and says a person, and a person’s response to naturalness and original sound answers.

Grock, by a user wanted to check the allegations of another user by a user

Unlike AI’s assistants, the human truth and checkers use information, very reliable sources to check data. They also receive full reports with themselves and organizations to ensure their findings and organizations with their findings.

Although it seems that there is a privatized response to Prix Sinha, GroK, GROK, which has a private response to the website of India’s non-profit facts, is as good as the information.

“What information is provided and the government’s intervention, etc., which is, this will enter the picture,” he said.

“There is no transparency. Everything that does not have transparency will damage it, because in any way without transparency can be molded in any way.”

“Abuse can be used – disseminate incorrect information”

In one of the answers placed in this week, x in x recognizes “Abuse can be abused – disseminate incorrect information and break the confidentiality.”

However, the automated account does not show any privilege for users when they receive their answers, for example, the potential response of the AI, which is incorrectly informed.

The response to the GROK’s incorrect information can be spread (translated from Hinglish

“Can provide information to answer”, “Anushka Jain, Goa-Based multifaceted digital research collectively coordinate a research on the Digital Futures Lab.

Positions in X on X use what quality control size is to use, using posts, training information and checking these labels. Last summer, this pushed a change It turned out that Grok was allowed to consume X user information in the standard.

As GROC assistants through social media platforms, the other, the other is handed over to their public data – as opposed to chatrpt or other conversations.

Although the information obtained from a user’s assistant is not wrong or completely correct, others may believe in the platform.

This may cause serious social damage. In these cases seen in India before Error data spread in WhatsApp to Mob Lynchings. However, these serious events occurred before arrival of a genea that makes the generation of synthetic content easier and looks more realistic.

“If you see this grok answers, I’m amazed that most of them may be, but it can be, but it can be.

AI vs Real Face-checkers

The AI, including Xai, cleans the AI ​​models to more people, but they cannot replace – they cannot replace.

During the last few months, technological companies are investigating people to reduce the reliability of man’s truth. Platforms, including X and Meta, began to cover the new concept of such a pain with the community notes.

Of course, such changes are also concerned about the fact that the fact is.

Sinha, optimally, people will learn to distinguish between the real checkers, optimize, and the people will further evaluate the accuracy of people.

“We will see the return of the fact that the fact that the end of the Sarakache will see the return of the fact,” said IFCN’s Holan.

However, he said this time, the fact that the truth will probably do more with the data created by the rapidly spreading information.

“Many of this issue are really true or not, are you just looking for something that sounds true, and the real truth? Because the AI ​​helps you,” he said.

X and Xai did not meet our request for comment.



Source link

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *